The Strength of Indemnities
The High Court in Western Cape ruled, during December 2014, that indemnities used by dive businesses / operators are indeed not beyond reproach.
(https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Victory-for-widow-in-shark-cage-dive-case-20141228 ).
In 2008, a vessel, carrying tourists on route from a shark diving trip was hit by a wave. It capsized and 3 people drowned.
The court ruled that a defense based on the fact that a tourist signed an indemnity was not sufficient and held the company and the skipper, liable. The cause of action revolved around the negligence for failing to notice deterioration in sailing conditions.
Although there are early indications of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, the legal fraternity has (in our view correctly so), already added: “It is forcing businesses to rethink their indemnity methods”. From our earlier discussions (available in the Alert Diver Magazine - http://goo.gl/JAkBQM page 40), the strength of total reliance on an indemnity has already been questioned. This decision lends strength to that thought. In our view, liability for negligence cannot just be indemnified by an agreement.
The business / operator and its staff still need to take due care, more so given the fact that we are in the high risk business of diving. At this stage the actual law report is not yet available. It will be fully discussed and commented on in our next edition. However, if you have any enquiries or questions, you are most welcome to address them to DANSA, who shall respond to them as comprehensively as possible.
From a practical standpoint, we would like to encourage Dive Operators, Resorts and Businesses to participate in the DAN Dive Safety Partners (http://www.dansa.org/industry-partners.htm ) and DAN Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment programmes (http://goo.gl/nOQZcC ). This will allow them to address potential safety issues pro-actively and objectively – not only to reduce their potential liability, but also towards achieving the greater objective of making diving safer and incident-free.
(https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Victory-for-widow-in-shark-cage-dive-case-20141228 ).
In 2008, a vessel, carrying tourists on route from a shark diving trip was hit by a wave. It capsized and 3 people drowned.
The court ruled that a defense based on the fact that a tourist signed an indemnity was not sufficient and held the company and the skipper, liable. The cause of action revolved around the negligence for failing to notice deterioration in sailing conditions.
Although there are early indications of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, the legal fraternity has (in our view correctly so), already added: “It is forcing businesses to rethink their indemnity methods”. From our earlier discussions (available in the Alert Diver Magazine - http://goo.gl/JAkBQM page 40), the strength of total reliance on an indemnity has already been questioned. This decision lends strength to that thought. In our view, liability for negligence cannot just be indemnified by an agreement.
The business / operator and its staff still need to take due care, more so given the fact that we are in the high risk business of diving. At this stage the actual law report is not yet available. It will be fully discussed and commented on in our next edition. However, if you have any enquiries or questions, you are most welcome to address them to DANSA, who shall respond to them as comprehensively as possible.
From a practical standpoint, we would like to encourage Dive Operators, Resorts and Businesses to participate in the DAN Dive Safety Partners (http://www.dansa.org/industry-partners.htm ) and DAN Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment programmes (http://goo.gl/nOQZcC ). This will allow them to address potential safety issues pro-actively and objectively – not only to reduce their potential liability, but also towards achieving the greater objective of making diving safer and incident-free.
Posted in Alert Diver Summer Editions, Dive Safety FAQ
Posted in Liability releases, Indemnity form, Courtactions, Legal advice
Posted in Liability releases, Indemnity form, Courtactions, Legal advice
Categories
2024
February
March
April
May
2023
January
March
Terrific Freedive ModeKaboom!....The Big Oxygen Safety IssueScuba Nudi ClothingThe Benefits of Being BaldDive into Freedive InstructionCape Marine Research and Diver DevelopmentThe Inhaca Ocean Alliance.“LIGHTS, Film, Action!”Demo DiversSpecial Forces DiverWhat Dive Computers Don\'t Know | PART 2Toughing It Out Is Dangerous
April
July
August
September
Mismatched Scuba Valves to Cylinder OutletsUnderwater Crime Scene InvestigatorsDive Boat Etiquette – From Yachts to rubber ducksTravel Smarter: Personal Safety While TravelingLiability in ContextLearning from Success. Learning from MistakeDive in the Fast Lane with DPVsKwaZulu Natal shipwrecks: The ProduceAvoid Diving With EarplugsThe Parting ShotWeight loss for diversPredive Warm-UpTara Panton's Cape NudibranchsMonitoring Cardiac Health in Scuba DiversRESEARCHER PROFILE: Petar Denoble: Solving practical issues for divers
October
2022
January
February
UNCERTAINTY AFTER DIVING: Case Report and Recommendations #1.UNCERTAINTY AFTER DIVING: Case Report and Recommendations #2DIVERS LOSING ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CAREUNCERTAINTY AFTER DIVING: Case Report and Recommendations #3UNCERTAINTY AFTER DIVING: Case Report and Recommendations #4Preventing Breathing gas Contamination
No Comments